[BritZone Discussion]
a variety of conspiracy theories raised after the tragedy of 9/11. The theories question the accuracy of the official report of the event. The theories also assert that the report made officially by Bush Regime is not sufficiently forthright, or truthful. Up today many scientists opposed what Bush Said about the tragedy according to their understanding and their scientific fact or data. (you can ask uncle google about this issue)
eramuslim digest magazine 2nd Edition have once discussed it in the article entitled “the dark side of 911” they included scientific fact and data too.
but I remember a book I found in my Office Library. The book is translation edition of Naom Chomsky’s entitled “Mengungkap Terorisme International”. I just read several pages (as I have to finish the previous book I borrowed). Naom Chomsky stated in his theory the correlation between Language and mind. I can’t explain in detail but from my short reading I grab the idea that the language can influence one’s pattern of thought. for example when you hear someone says “he is a bad guy”. if you just hear it once or twice you will be so curious and keep asking, “is he a bad guy?” or “what make him be a bad guy?”, and so on. but if the sentence is uttered repeatedly, every day, every time, automatically it will form a belief in your mind that he is a bad guy .
I think that’s what happen today, the term of terrorist was built after the tragedy of 9/11, and up today many events alike happen around the world (like bombings, hijackings, etc) is always correlated with terrorist, and often it’s attached with the word ‘Islam’, before or after the word of terrorist.
Many sources stated that the first term of terrorist which is given to Osama bin Laden is only a political trick, to smoothen the way to take over the Middle East.
a variety of conspiracy theories raised after the tragedy of 9/11. The theories question the accuracy of the official report of the event. The theories also assert that the report made officially by Bush Regime is not sufficiently forthright, or truthful. Up today many scientists opposed what Bush Said about the tragedy according to their understanding and their scientific fact or data. (you can ask uncle google about this issue)
eramuslim digest magazine 2nd Edition have once discussed it in the article entitled “the dark side of 911” they included scientific fact and data too.
but I remember a book I found in my Office Library. The book is translation edition of Naom Chomsky’s entitled “Mengungkap Terorisme International”. I just read several pages (as I have to finish the previous book I borrowed). Naom Chomsky stated in his theory the correlation between Language and mind. I can’t explain in detail but from my short reading I grab the idea that the language can influence one’s pattern of thought. for example when you hear someone says “he is a bad guy”. if you just hear it once or twice you will be so curious and keep asking, “is he a bad guy?” or “what make him be a bad guy?”, and so on. but if the sentence is uttered repeatedly, every day, every time, automatically it will form a belief in your mind that he is a bad guy .
I think that’s what happen today, the term of terrorist was built after the tragedy of 9/11, and up today many events alike happen around the world (like bombings, hijackings, etc) is always correlated with terrorist, and often it’s attached with the word ‘Islam’, before or after the word of terrorist.
Many sources stated that the first term of terrorist which is given to Osama bin Laden is only a political trick, to smoothen the way to take over the Middle East.
No comments:
Post a Comment